In July, 2025, Danny Keith Martin violated an Alberta Court of King’s bench order by posting about his target on twitter – for the 3rd time.
This was very far from the first time he violated court orders to continue his determined harrassment of women. He has violated orders in British Columbia as well as Alberta.
Danny ‘SuperBald’ Martin was sued in British Columbia in 2022 for his mindless activites on Twitter. “Dann Martin AKA Hungry Trucker AKA Danny Martin AKA Douglas Cronk AKA Doug Cronk AKA Cronk Enterprises has been harassing women for years.”
 |
“I have been the target of a smear campaign and online harassment from Brianne Amira Duke”
Danny ‘Bald’ Martin needed to appear in NW court June 10, 2025. |
Statement of Claim is HERE. Brainless Response to Civil Claim is HERE.
 |
Grade school drop out Danny ‘SuperBald’ Martin clearly has NO CLUE what a Response to Civil Claim Statement is. |
He is an uneducated baffoon.
.
Core Allegations:
1. Harassment and Cyberbullying:
The Plaintiff alleges that Danny Martin conducted an extensive and ongoing campaign of online harassment. The document outlines that Martin used social media and other internet platforms to:
“…publish false and malicious statements with the intention of harming the Plaintiff’s reputation and mental health.”
These publications allegedly included personal insults, fabricated claims, and identifying information intended to cause public embarrassment and fear.
2. Defamation and Character Assassination:
The Plaintiff claims the statements made by Martin were:
“…false, defamatory, and made with reckless disregard for the truth.”
The lawsuit emphasizes that these statements damaged the Plaintiff’s personal and professional reputation. The defamatory remarks were shared with third parties and posted publicly online.
3. Emotional and Psychological Harm:
The Plaintiff asserts that the harassment caused significant emotional harm, including:
“…severe anxiety, emotional distress, and feelings of helplessness due to the relentless nature of the attacks.”
It is alleged that Martin’s conduct was intentional and malicious, designed to cause lasting psychological damage.
Legal Relief Sought:
The Plaintiff seeks the following:
-
General damages for loss of reputation and emotional distress.
-
Special damages, if applicable (e.g., lost income or costs associated with the harm).
-
Punitive damages to deter similar conduct by the Defendant.
-
Injunctive relief, including an order prohibiting Danny Martin from contacting the Plaintiff or publishing further material.
Key Quotes from the Claim:
-
“The Defendant’s conduct was high-handed, malicious, and callous.”
-
“The Plaintiff has suffered irreparable harm to their reputation and well-being.”
-
“The defamatory statements were made with the intention of causing the Plaintiff public embarrassment, ridicule, and contempt.”
Contextual Note:
Although some personal details and specific instances are redacted or not visible in the excerpted pages, the tone and structure of the claim are consistent with civil suits involving targeted online defamation, harassment, and mental distress resulting from ongoing digital misconduct.